<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<document>
  <approved-at type="datetime">2009-12-01T00:00:00-06:00</approved-at>
  <county-id type="integer">20079</county-id>
  <created-at type="datetime">2010-01-11T21:35:17-06:00</created-at>
  <description>To Provide Municipal and Industrial (M&amp;I) Water to City and Surrounding Region, Equus Beds Division, Wichita Project, Kansas, Harvey, Sedgwick, and Reno Counties, KS</description>
  <docsize type="integer">8</docsize>
  <doctype-id type="integer">7</doctype-id>
  <id type="integer">523</id>
  <link>http://www.usbr.gov/gp/otao/equus/final_eis_1109.pdf</link>
  <name>Equus Beds Aquifer Storage Recharge and Recovery Project</name>
  <state-id type="integer">20</state-id>
  <summary>BR 

The document analyzes potential impacts from the Equus Beds Aquifer Storage Recharge and Recovery Project (ASR). Two alternatives are considered in the
EIS. The Preferred Alternative would divert a total of 100 MGD of water from the Little Arkansas River during high flows to recharge the Equus Beds Aquifer
for later municipal and industrial M&amp;I) use by the City. The Federal government would fund (cost-share) up to 25% (or $30 million, whichever is less) of the construction costs, of Phases IIb, III and IV of the ASR. The City has already completed Phase I and is working on Phase IIa. No Federal funding was used for these early phases. Since the City would complete the project without the Federal cost-share, the same 100 MGD ASR is also considered as the No Action
Alternative. There would be no Federal funding in No Action.</summary>
  <updated-at type="datetime">2010-01-11T21:35:17-06:00</updated-at>
</document>
